What if anything is going to be done about spamming of *.answers

---------

pshuang@MIT.EDU
Mon, 5 Dec 94 07:34:28 -0500


Grumble. Sorry about the unuseful reply I just sent. My fingers got
confused about which emacs I was in.

> It is my understanding that a certain unscrupulous company has begun marking
> commercial articles as approved for posting to groups such as rec.answers.
>
> Do the news.answers faq moderation team plan on doing anything beyond
> cancelling such postings?

Could you be more specific (give Subject lines and Message-ID's)?
While we don't always patrol each *.answers extraordinarily carefully,
we do read them ourselves to watch for articles that don't seem to
belong, and our archival scripts do complain about postings that show
up in *.answers which we don't have in our records as being approved
by us. I don't recall seeing any flurries of commercial articles with
forged approvals cross-posted into rec.answers recently, nor has our
script noticed anything in particular.

Ping Huang, member of the *.answers moderation team
(news-answers-request@MIT.EDU)



[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]

---------

faq-admin@landfield.com

© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved