I wasn't clear. Nobody can rely on it was intended as: "No FAQ
maintainer (no poster) can rely on X-Copyright. Who reads the
posting can indeed rely on it."
> Unless the header has some kind of official and quasi-legal standing,
> there is no requirement on service providers to use it, so the whole
> scheme will be completely ineffective.
I wasn't clear on this, then: there's no *requirement* to use or
even care it. If a reader (or a service provider) *wants* to use
it, fine. Again: it's intended as a service.
> Yes, it is very easy to think of how to implement it. Now, I'll put on
> the net.update.cynic hat: "if you think it is such a wonderful idea, then
> you implement it and trial it in a corner of the net and if everyone likes
> it, everyone will flock to it".
OK, since you are the only person who discussed this a bit, and given
your answer it this, I'll do it. I have a UUCP-only link to the Internet,
but I'll find a "corner of the net" to try it.
Bye,
-- # $Id: .signature,v 1.2 1994/03/24 16:18:53 piero Exp $ Piero Serini Via Giambologna, 1 <piero@strider.st.dsi.unimi.it> I 20136 Milano - ITALY
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved