That X-header wouldn't cause *any* legal restriction.
Its use would only be a way to help people to not download files
on a per-copyright basis. For legal restriction, the actual Copyright
must *always* be checked.
> Who is going to be the
> keeper of the list of standard identifiers and how can we force people to
> use them?
//rtfm.mit.edu/some/path/X-COPYRIGHT.CODES
FAQ maintainers should add that line, like they do with all the other
headers, for news-answers-request approval.
> Sue anyone you want for editorial selection of
> your messages, but lay off legitimate ways to feed news and to recover
> costs from such feeding.
I think this goes the same direction like the previous posted article
about "let's make easier for them knowing about Copyright".
> You'll destroy USENET rather than help it.
Again, there's no legal restriction in a X-header. I hope I clarified
my point of view, now.
Bye,
-- # $Id: .signature,v 1.2 1994/03/24 16:18:53 piero Exp $ Piero Serini Via Giambologna, 1 <piero@strider.st.dsi.unimi.it> I 20136 Milano - ITALY
[
Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive |
Search Mail Archive |
Authors |
Usenet
]
[
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997
]
© Copyright The Landfield Group, 1997
All rights reserved