Re: Digest VS. Thomas Fine format

Thomas A. Fine (fine@cis.ohio-state.edu)
Mon, 29 Nov 93 13:01:59 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Thomas A. Fine: "Re: Digest VS. Thomas Fine format"
Previous message: Thomas A. Fine: "Re: Summary: Comments made on 1st Run FAQL Format"

>
>After reading over Thomas Fine's FAQ format specification and a little
>of the digest format specification, I'm asking myself "Are these
>two seperate FAQ format specifications that are existing which people
>are chosing (one or the other)? OR is the digest format used for something
>other than posting FAQs to usenet to be read by people?"
>It's just not clear to me what's going on.

The Digest format is beneficial because not only does it convert to
html (poorly), but it also is used by most news readers, and I'm told
you can convince emacs outline-mode to deal with it.

tom

Next message: Thomas A. Fine: "Re: Digest VS. Thomas Fine format"
Previous message: Thomas A. Fine: "Re: Summary: Comments made on 1st Run FAQL Format"

[ Usenet Hypertext FAQ Archive | Search Mail Archive | Authors | Usenet ]
[ 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 ]