This Howto is available in
other formats.
Preferably downloadable:
documentation tarball.
You may find this Howto as part of the
Linux Documentation Project.
Looking for other languages? See the
German version, then!
History
2002-09-19: links about ebtables have been updated in the
"Related Topics" Section. Added note about
"false positive" br-nf debugging output.
2002-10-08: Added section
Actual configuration
and hints about routing in
Setting up the routing,
Ping it, Jim!
, resp.
Ethernet bridges connect two or more distinct ethernet segments transparently.
An ethernet bridge distributes ethernet frames coming in on one port to other ports
associated to the bridge interface. This is accomplished with brain: Whenever the
bridge knows on which port the MAC address to which the frame is to be delivered
is located it forwards this frame only to this only port instead of polluting all
ports together.
Ethernet interfaces can be added to an existing bridge interface
and become then (logical) ports of the bridge interface.
Putting a netfilter structure on top of a bridge interface renders the bridge capable
of servicing filtering mechanisms. This way, a transparent filtering instance can be
created. It even needs no IP address assigned to work.
Of course, you can assign an IP address to the bridge interface for maintenance
purposes ( certainly, with ssh only ;-).
The advantage of this system is evident. Transparency alleviates the network
administrator of the pain of restructuring the network topology. And users may
not notice the existence of the bridge but their connection beeing blocked. Also,
users are not disturbed while working (think of a company where network connection loss
pays alot).
The other common case is a client beeing connected to the global web via a leased
router. As the providers seldomly grant administration privileges on their leasing
hardware, the client cannot change the interconnecting configuration.
But, of course, the client has a network running, and wants to spend at least as
possible, he does not want to reconfigure his entire network. And he does not need
to if he uses a bridging device.
This software setup is needed on the ethernet bridge computer. According to our Testing grounds.
As of kernel version 2.4.18 there's already support for the Ethernet Bridge
capability built-in. No patches needed so far.
But if we intend to use netfilter capabilities, because we want to run iptables on our new Linux router/fw box, we still need to apply a patch.
Any patches needed can be found and downloaded on the
sourceforge Ethernet Bridge homepage.
root@bridge:~> cd /usr/src/
root@bridge:~> wget -c http://bridge.sourceforge.net/devel/bridge-nf/bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.18.diff
root@bridge:~> cd /usr/src/linux/
root@bridge:~> patch -p1 -i ../bridge-nf/bridge-nf-0.0.7-against-2.4.18.diff
Supposedly we want netfilter support on our bridge interface and we have already patched the vanillal kernel we may now activate some necessary kernel configuration items. On how to build a private kernel image see the CD-Net-Install-HOWTO, Toolbox. Oh, yeah, it's still in German only. Hm, I have to fix this some time..
Nevertheless, we start by now: In
Code maturity level options
we activate
[*] Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers
and in
Loadable module support
[*] Enable loadable module support
[*] Set version information on all module symbols
[*] Kernel module loader
Ok, so far so good.
Now, we go to
Networking options
and mark
[*] Network packet filtering (replaces ipchains)
[*] Network packet filtering debugging
Furthermore, in
IP: Netfilter Configuration --->
we mark any item we need as module.
Now the long awaited item: activate
<M> 802.1d Ethernet Bridging
as well as
[*] netfilter (firewalling) support
The above entry is available only if we successfully patched our kernel!
Finally, we just need a successful
root@bridge:~> make dep clean bzImage modules modules_install
cycle and we're done.
Don't forget to edit /etc/lilo.conf
and do
root@bridge:~> lilo -t
root@bridge:~> lilo
root@bridge:~> reboot
, though.
Perhaps we might mark our new kernel as the bridge kernel? We
vi
the toplevel Makefile in our kernel sources and edit the head
line called EXTRAVERSION =
.
We may actually set it to, say bridge? ;-)
After the modules_install
we find the fresh modules in
/lib/modules/2.4.18bridge
brctl
Once our kernel has the capabilities needed to perform Ethernet Bridge and netfilter
actions, we prepare the user space tool brctl
. brctl
is the configuration
tool we use to
set up anything to suit our needs.
We download the source tarball, unpack it and change directory into it.
root@bridge:~> wget -c http://bridge.sourceforge.net/bridge-utils/bridge-utils-0.9.5.tar.gz
root@bridge:~> tar xvzf bridge-utils-0.9.5.tar.gz
root@bridge:~> cd bridge-utils-0.9.5
At this time, read the README
and the files in the doc/
subdirectory.
Then do a simple make and copy the resulting brctl/brctl
executable to
/sbin/
.
root@bridge:~> make
root@bridge:~> cp -vi brctl/brctl /sbin/
This is it. Go for
Setup now.
We need Linux to know about the bridge. First tell it that we want one virtual
ethernet bridge interface: (this is to be executed on host bridge
, of course.
See
Testing grounds)
root@bridge:~> brctl addbr br0
Second, we do not need the STP (Spanning Tree Protocol). I.e. we do only have
one single router, so a loop is highly improbable. We may then deactivate this feature.
(Results in less polluted networking environment, too):
root@bridge:~> brctl stp br0 off
After these preparations, we now do finally some effective commands. We add our two
(or even more) physical ethernet interfaces. That means, we attach them to the just
born logical (virtual) bridge interface br0
.
root@bridge:~> brctl addif br0 eth0
root@bridge:~> brctl addif br0 eth1
Now, our two previously physical ethernet interfaces became a logical bridge port each.
Erm, ok, there were and will be the physical devices. They are still there,
go have a look ;-) But now they became part of the logical bridge device and
therefore need no IP configuration any longer. So release the IPs:
root@bridge:~> ifconfig eth0 down
root@bridge:~> ifconfig eth1 down
root@bridge:~> ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 up
root@bridge:~> ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 up
Great! We now have a box w/o any IP attached. So if you were configuring your future
fw/router via TP, go for your local console now ;-)) You have a serial console? Happy one :-)We tell Linux the new (logical) interface and associate one single IP with it:
root@bridge:~> ifconfig br0 10.0.3.129 up
In case we are configuring a gateway we enable the forwarding in the linux kernel.
root@bridge:~> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Our box already has an IP assigned but no default route. We
solve this now:
root@bridge:~> route add default gw 10.0.3.129
Finally, we should have a working net from, to and through the gateway.
We imagine this scenario or similar:
/\
Ethernet Ethernet ATM /-/ \
--------- --------- --------- /-/ |
| Box |----------|Bridge |----------|Router |-----| Inter- \
--------- --------- --------- \ net ---|
^ ^ ^ ^ \ /
| | | | \---/
eth0 eth0 eth1 if0 ^
| | | | |
10.0.3.2 none/10.0.3.1 195.137.15.7 anything else
\ /
\ /
^ \-br0-/
| ^ ^
| ^ | |
| | | |
own own foreign hostile
Our administrative power includes only machines marked with own
, the Router is
completely off-limits and so is the Internet, of course.
We will configure the Box' eth0 as usual. The bridge's interfaces
are configured as described in
Setup.
If we are to use forwarding we might perhaps do this one: ;-)
root@bridge:~> echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
Optionally, we set up a default route:
root@bridge:~> route add default gw 10.0.3.129
Then we set up some iptables rules on host bridge
:
root@bridge:~> iptables -P FORWARD DROP
root@bridge:~> iptables -F FORWARD
root@bridge:~> iptables -I FORWARD -j ACCEPT
root@bridge:~> iptables -I FORWARD -j LOG
root@bridge:~> iptables -I FORWARD -j DROP
root@bridge:~> iptables -A FORWARD -j DROP
root@bridge:~> iptables -x -v --line-numbers -L FORWARD
The last line gives us the following output:
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
1 0 0 DROP all -- any any anywhere anywhere
2 0 0 LOG all -- any any anywhere anywhere LOG level warning
3 0 0 ACCEPT all -- any any anywhere anywhere
4 0 0 DROP all -- any any anywhere anywhere
The LOG
target logs every packet via syslogd
. Beware, this is intended for
testing purposes only, remove in production environment. Else you end up either with
filled logs and harddisk partitions by you yourself or anyone else does this Denial
of Service to you. You've been warned.box
:
root@box:~> ping -c 3 195.137.15.7
PING router.provider.net (195.137.15.7) from 10.0.3.2 : 56(84) bytes of data.
--- router.provider.net ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% loss, time 2020ms
^C
root@box:~>
By default, we DROP
everything. No response, no logged packet. This netfilter
setup is designed to DROP
all packets unless we delete the rule that drops every
packet (rule no. 1 above) before the LOG
target matches:
root@bridge:~> iptables -D FORWARD 1
root@bridge:~> iptables -x -v --line-numbers -L FORWARD
Now, the rules are:
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
num pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
2 0 0 LOG all -- any any anywhere anywhere LOG level warning
3 0 0 ACCEPT all -- any any anywhere anywhere
4 0 0 DROP all -- any any anywhere anywhere
And any packet may pass through. Test it with a ping on host box
:
root@box:~> ping -c 3 195.137.15.7
PING router.provider.net (195.137.15.7) from 10.0.3.2 : 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from router.provider.net (195.137.15.7): icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.103 ms
64 bytes from router.provider.net (195.137.15.7): icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.082 ms
64 bytes from router.provider.net (195.137.15.7): icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.083 ms
--- router.provider.net ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% loss, time 2002ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.082/0.089/0.103/0.012 ms
root@box:~>
Yippeah! The router is alive, up and running. (Well it has been all day long.. ;-)
When we just fired up the bridge interface it takes about roughly 30 seconds
until the bridge is fully operational. This is due the 30-seconds-learning phase
of the bridge interface. During this phase, the bridge ports are learning what
MAC addresses exist on what port. The bridge author, Lennert, tells us in his
TODO file, the 30-seconds-learning phase is subjected to some improvement in a
timely manner some time.
During the test phase, no packet will we forwarded. No ping be answered.
Remind this!
This section is intended to give you, dear reader, some hints about how your system should look and feel after having processed this howto successfully.
The output of your ifconfig
command might look similar to
this:
root@bridge:~> ifconfig
br0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:75:81:D2:1D
inet addr:10.0.3.129 Bcast:195.30.198.255 Mask:255.255.255.128
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:826 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:737 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:161180 (157.4 Kb) TX bytes:66708 (65.1 Kb)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:75:81:ED:B7
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:5729 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:3115 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:656
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:1922290 (1.8 Mb) TX bytes:298837 (291.8 Kb)
Interrupt:11 Base address:0xe400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:04:75:81:D2:1D
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:1 frame:0
TX packets:243 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:342 (342.0 b) TX bytes:48379 (47.2 Kb)
Interrupt:7 Base address:0xe800
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:1034 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1034 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:82068 (80.1 Kb) TX bytes:82068 (80.1 Kb)
The output of your route
command might look similar to
this:
root@bridge:~> route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
10.0.3.129 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.128 U 0 0 0 br0
0.0.0.0 10.0.3.129 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 br0
root@bridge:~>
Please have a look at the Ping it, Jim! section.
Apparently, there must have been a bug in the br-nf code:
From: Bart De Schuymer <bart.de.schuymer_@_pandora.be>
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 21:52:46 +0200
To: Nils Radtke <Nils.Radtke_@_Think-Future.de>
Subject: Re: Ethernet-Brigde-netfilter-HOWTO
Hello Nils,
[...]
Also, network packet filtering debugging is generally a bad idea with the
br-nf patch. It can gives a lot of false warnings (about bugs) in the logs.
[...]
Personally, I never had false positives in my log. Maybe, that bug has been fixed. This mailed to Bart, he wrote:
From: Bart De Schuymer <bart.de.schuymer_@_pandora.be>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 18:30:25 +0200
To: Nils Radtke <Nils.Radtke_@_Think-Future.de>
Subject: Re: Ethernet-Brigde-netfilter-HOWTO
On Monday 02 September 2002 00:39, Nils Radtke wrote:
> Will the revision of the nf-debug code in br-nf be subject of improvement?
I must admit I haven't been running any kernel with netfilter debugging
lately. It sure used to give false positives a few months ago (the bridge
mailing list has posts about that), I've been lacking time to see why and if
it is still the case. It's on my todo list.
[...]
But (as of writing this 2002-09-19) I haven't found an official announcement,
this particular bug has been closed. So have a constant look at this topic on
the
ethernet bridge mailinglist
, if you are interested in it's cure.
The Howto's author may be contacted via
e-mail.
Howto Author's homepage.
Ethernet Bridge Mailinglist
Home of Linux kernel Ethernet Bridge
Bridge-STP-HOWTO
Firewalling for Free, Shawn Grimes
ebtables, sourceforge
ebtables, homepage at pandora.be
ebtables, supported features
ebtables, examples:
basic,
advanced
ebtables, in-depth documentation
ebtables, Hacking HOWTO
IP mode, LVS
High-Availability Linux
LVS