background image
comply, it would be at war with the Islamic nation, a nation that al Qaeda's
leaders said "desires death more than you desire life."
15
History and Political Context
Few fundamentalist movements in the Islamic world gained lasting political
power. In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, fundamentalists helped artic-
ulate anticolonial grievances but played little role in the overwhelmingly sec-
ular struggles for independence after World War I.Western-educated lawyers,
soldiers, and officials led most independence movements, and clerical influence
and traditional culture were seen as obstacles to national progress.
After gaining independence from Western powers following World War II,
the Arab Middle East followed an arc from initial pride and optimism to today's
mix of indifference, cynicism, and despair. In several countries, a dynastic state
already existed or was quickly established under a paramount tribal family.
Monarchies in countries such as Saudi Arabia, Morocco, and Jordan still sur-
vive today.Those in Egypt, Libya, Iraq, and Yemen were eventually overthrown
by secular nationalist revolutionaries.
The secular regimes promised a glowing future, often tied to sweeping ide-
ologies (such as those promoted by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser's
Arab Socialism or the Ba'ath Party of Syria and Iraq) that called for a single,
secular Arab state. However, what emerged were almost invariably autocratic
regimes that were usually unwilling to tolerate any opposition--even in coun-
tries, such as Egypt, that had a parliamentary tradition. Over time, their poli-
cies--repression, rewards, emigration, and the displacement of popular anger
onto scapegoats (generally foreign)--were shaped by the desire to cling to
power.
The bankruptcy of secular, autocratic nationalism was evident across the
Muslim world by the late 1970s.At the same time, these regimes had closed off
nearly all paths for peaceful opposition, forcing their critics to choose silence,
exile, or violent opposition. Iran's 1979 revolution swept a Shia theocracy into
power. Its success encouraged Sunni fundamentalists elsewhere.
In the 1980s, awash in sudden oil wealth, Saudi Arabia competed with Shia
Iran to promote its Sunni fundamentalist interpretation of Islam,Wahhabism.
The Saudi government, always conscious of its duties as the custodian of Islam's
holiest places, joined with wealthy Arabs from the Kingdom and other states
bordering the Persian Gulf in donating money to build mosques and religious
schools that could preach and teach their interpretation of Islamic doctrine.
In this competition for legitimacy, secular regimes had no alternative to
offer. Instead, in a number of cases their rulers sought to buy off local Islamist
movements by ceding control of many social and educational issues. Embold-
ened rather than satisfied, the Islamists continued to push for power--a trend
especially clear in Egypt. Confronted with a violent Islamist movement that
killed President Anwar Sadat in 1981, the Egyptian government combined
52
THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT
Final1-4.4pp 7/17/04 9:12 AM Page 52