It FORMATION REP RT
TELEGRAM
lilllMSYri (CI
tvi M
CENTRAL lOTQJJG^rVrCE
REPORT NO. DATE DISTIL PRECEDENCE
'
_ pUNGAN
REFERENCESRSE?*
COUNTRY SOUTH VIETNAM
SUBJECT VIEWSRITISB AMBASSADOR TO SOUTH
. HOHLER,HALIST SOLUTION FOR SOUTH VIETNAM
DATE OF BARLY3
FIELD REPORT NO.
TED MPQfMATIOM. SOURCE QRADINQS AWE DEFINITIVE. APPRAISAL OF CO
nWM'7PPRAISAL SEE BELOW
s
50JSCE
1. BRITISH AMBASSADOR TO SOUTH. HOHLER, TOLD A
JOURNALIST2 THAT BE BAD BEEN READING SOME OF THE JOIJRNALIST 'S ARTICLES AND WAS PARTICULARLY INTERESTEDATE JUKE ARTICLE ON THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE CHINESE COMMUNISTS AND THE SOVIETS OVER NORTH VIETNAM. AFTER DISCUSSING THESE DIFFERENCES AT LENGTH, TBE AMBASSADOR STATED HIS BELIEFHIRD FORCE IN VIETNAM IS NOT ONLY POSSIBLE, BUT ACTUALLY EXISTS, AND THATHIRD FORCE IN NORTH VIETNAM, COMBINED WITH NEUTRALIST ELEMENTS IN SOUTH VIETNAM, IS TEE ONLY HOPE FOR VIETNAM. HOHLER EMPHASIZED TEAT THE ONLY SOLUTION FOR SOUTH VIETNAMEUTRALIST OOA^TTTON
APPR0VIOIDRRE11ASI QUE:1
SIMILAR TO
NOFORN/CONTIN
STATI i AKMT/ACS1 AVT JAM
INFORMATION REPORT
TELEGRAM
ICI
MM 2
9
WORKED OUT FOR LAOS. THE AMBASSADOR SAID THAT THE AMERICANS ARE NOT TRAINED IN GUERILLA WARFARE AND CAN NOT WIN THE WAR AGAINST THE VIETNAMESE COMMUNISTS (VC) IN SOUTH VIETNAM.
2, THE CONVERSATION TOOK PLACE AT THE HOME OF PETER ROBERTS, INFORMATION OFFICER AT THE BRITISH EMBASSY IN SAIGON, WHERE
JOURNALIST
ROBERTSEETING BETWEEN THE/ AND AMBASSADOR HOHLER. JOURNALIST
THE/ HAS KNOWN ROBERTS FOR SOME TIME THROUGH PRESS CONFERENCES
AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS AMONG JOURNALISTS. HE WAS SURPRISED TO LEARN
THAT ROBERTS HAD ARRANGED THE MEETING AT THE REQUEST OF THE
AMBASSADOR, WHO HADESIRE TO TALK WITH HDM. JOURNALIST
3. NEITHER THE/ NOR ROBERTS HAD MUCH OPPORTUNITY TO STATE
JOURNALIST
THEIR VIEWS DURING THE CONVERSATION. THE/ ASSURED THE AMBASSADOR
THAT, FAR FROM BEING NEUTRALIST MINDED, HE FEARS NEUTRALISM FOR
SOUTH VIETNAM MORE THAN ANY OTHER SOLUTION SINCE HE BELIEVES
NEUTRALISM TO BE NO MOREAJOR STEP TOWARD ULTIMATE TAKEOVER
AND CONTROL BY THE COMMUNISTS, ROBERTS POINTEDLY DISAGREED
WITH AMBASSADOR HOHLER'S STATEMENT THAT THERE IS NO CHANCE OF
WINNING THE WAR IN SOUTH VIETNAM, INDICATING THAT IT IS MUCH TOO
EARLY TO MAKELUNT STATEMENT, ALLUDING TO THE HUGE EFFORT .
UNDER WAY AND THE GAINS ALREADY APPARENT. ROBERTS DIO SAY,
HOWEVER, THAT THE SURFACING OF THE OPERATIONS IN NORTH VIETNAM '
NGHE AN AND HOA BlNH SHOULD DEMONSTRATE TO THE
OF
AMERICANS AND TO THE GOVERNMENT/iUETNAM THE FUTILITY OF SUCH OPERATIONS.
c1ami motion -conuou
J
Mktm fMU4 I
ALSO COMMENTED THAT HE WAS SURPRISED AT THE FAILURE
OF THE VC TO REACT EARLIER IN THE PROPAGANDA FIELD TO OBVIOUSLY
EXPLOITABLE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF PRESIDENT NGO DJJTH DIEM
MiIrs
AND THE
JOURNALIST
COMMENT. THE/ SAID THAT HE THINKS THE ARTICLE THAT CAUGHT MAY HAVE BEEN
THE INTEREST OF AMBASSADOR HOHLER/ ONE OATELI NED SAIGON,a,
APPEARING IN AN EARLY JULY ISSUE OF THE PHILIPPINE HERALD, ENTITLED
"INTRA-PARTY RIFT IN RED NORTHOSCOW HAS AN EDGE ONOURNALIST
THE/ SAID THAT HE BELIEVED THAT THE AMBASSADOR HAD READ OUT OF THE CONTEXT
AND MISINTERPRETED VARIOUS STATEMENTS IN THE ARTICLE TO WHICH HE
/LED HIM TO CONSIDER THE/ EUTRALIST. THE STATEMENTSWW ICH APPEAR IN LAST PARAGRAPH OF THE ARTICLE,FOLLOWS: "STUDENTS OF COMMUNIST NORTH VIETNAM HEREAGREEMENT THAT THE REPORTEDT LEAST FOR THE- BY THE PRO-SOVIET GROUP, WILLEMPERATETHE COURSE OF EVENTS. UNLESS THE SCALES ARE TURNED BYFAVOR OF ITS PUPPETS AND IF THE FREE WORLD KNOWS HOW TOON THE RED DISPUTE, THE CHANCES WERE NOT DISMISSED OF A AND EVENOLITICAL
ami
SOLUTION TO EMBATTLED
COMMENT. ATE JULY CONVERSATION WITH AN AMERICAN OBSERVER, THE COUNSELLOR OF THE BRITISH EMBASSY IN. BURROWS, ATTACKED THE DIEM GOVERNMENT, STATING THAT
classificationdjiumi nation cohtiol1
EUSE ONLY
ic)
Ctl*ii i'Cationdisii-ikatcOm
Sgaplf^ T
THERE COULD BE NO HOPE OF PROGRESS AGAINST THE VC
UNLESS DIEM WERE REMOVED. IN CRITICIZING THE
ILLIBERALITY OF THE DIEM REGIME, BURROWS APPLIED STANDARDS
OF CRITICISM THAT EVEN THE MOST ADVANCED WESTERN DEMOCRACY WOULD
FAIL TO MEET. DURING THE SAME CONVERSATION, COLONEL HENRY LEE,
MILITARY ATTACHE TO THE BRITISH EMBASSY, EXPRESSED HIS OPINION
THAT THE WAR AGAINST THE VC WAS NOT PROCEEDING FAVORABLY FROM
THE WESTERN POINT OF VIEW. HE APPEARED CRITICAL OF DIEM AND
SEEMED INCLINEDILITARY JUNTA, POSSIBLY UNDER Tn
IC)
MAJOR GENERAL DUONG VAN MINE.)
ICOMMENT. US . AMBASSADOR TO SOUTH VIETNAM,
FREDERICK E. NOLTING,COMMENTEDUGUST THAT AMBASSADOR HOHLER
HAS NEVER GIVEN THE SLIGHTEST INDICATION THAT HE HOLDS THE
VIEWS ATTRIBUTED TO HIM IN THIS REPORT. UGUST, AMBASSADOR
HOHLEROMPLETELY CONTRARY LINEISCUSSION WITH
AMBASSADOR NOLTING, EXPRESSING OPTIMISM REGARDING THE PROSPECTS
OF THE GOVERNMENT OF VIETNAM. AMBASSADOR NOLT ING SAID THAT HE
BELIEVED THAT THE INFORMATION SHOULD BE TREATED WITH GREAT
RESERVE, AND WITH THE POSSlBLILITY IN MIND THAT IT MAY REPRESENT
A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO CREATE MISTRUST BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES
S,ri
AND GREAT
NGO DINH NHU, BROTHER AND POLITICAL
ADVISOR OF PRESIDENT NGO DINH DIEM, TOLD AN AMERICAN OBSERVER
owj
/'background use
NOFORN/COIfT
SECRET
UGUST THAT, WHILE HE CONSIDERS FRENCH POLICY BOTH IN PARIS AND IN SAIGON TO HAVE AS ITS OBJECTIVE THE NEUTRALIZATION OF SOUTH VIETNAM AND SOUTHEAST ASIA, HE FEELS THAT THE BRITISHONTRARY POLICY MORE SIMILAR TO THAT OF THE us. NHU SAID THAT HE HAS HAD NO INDICATIONS THAT CAUSE HIM CONCERN WITH RESPECT TO THE BRITISH ROLE IN SOUTH VIETNAM. AND INITIATED THE COMMENT THAT AMBASSADOR HOHLER HAD SAID TO HIM RECENTLY THAT AN CONFERENCE ON SOUTH VIETNAM OR THE NEUTRALIZATION OF SOUTH VIETNAM WAS
8. FIELD OISSEM: STATE (AMBASSADOR ONLY) cincpac pacflt pacaf arpac.
of message.
Original document.
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: