Created: 8/1/1962

OCR scan of the original document, errors are possible

2 k"





Soviet Intentions With Respect to Berlin



jun 9

rfct Mowing tnWBgMW ergonbofiOM participated in the preparation ot

Tho Cemral Intelligence Agency and th, intelligence orgonitalioni ot th* Depart, men* ofMtnw, tho Army, th* Navy, ond tho Air Force.


Director of Intelligence and teiearch. Department ot Stare Ovector. Detente Intelligence Agency

AwiUord aw of Staff tor Intelligence, Deportment of Iho Army AuiMnf Chief of Naval Operation*epartment of tho Navy Auutant Chief of Shjff. Intelligence, USAF Director for Intelligence. Jointclor of tho Natfonot Security Agency


1km Atomic Energy Com minion Rapreientatrveho USJB. and Ih*Foderal Bureau of Investigation, th* wb|*ct baing out vide of their juriidiction.


national intelligence estimate


Soviet Intentions With Respect to Berlin


the problem

To estimate probable Soviet Intentions over the next few months with respect to the Berlin and German questions.

the estimate

has probably concluded thatas they have been proceeding since last fall, offeroferlin agreement on terms favorableUSSR. He probably believes that to continue thelonger without any demonstrable gains would givethat the USSR feared to make good on itsto solve the Berlin problem with or withoutPowers. At present, therefore, the USSR isconsidering new decisions on its tactics for theof the Berlin crisis.


the present point the Soviets could proceedof three general lines. First, if they concluded thatof forward action were too high, they could holdln check and continue negotiationselativelyperhaps in some new forum. Second, they couldat once on the long-threatened course of atreaty. Third, they could seek to change thesurrounding further negotiations by raisingand pressuresuch higher level, reservingeparate treaty and its precise terms untilwhether these harsher tactics produced


ontinued Stalemate. The Soviets have not closed the door to further talks, and we cannot exclude the possibility that they will simply allow the present stalematedto continue without an appreciable increase in tensions. But the deliberate manner in which they have sharpened the issue in recent weeks, and the line taken Ln the Rusk-Gromyko talks, indicate that the Soviets are unlikely to adopt this alternative. Their hard stance, both in public and in negotiations, hasillingness to raise tensionsnowoint of deadlock has been reached.

eparate Treaty. To proceed forthwitheparate treaty presents the same problems it always has for theleaders. We believe that the Soviets continue tothe risks Involved in giving the East Germans control over allied access and then requiring the Western Powers to deal with those authorities. At the same time, however, the Soviets have intentionally given the peace treaty anas an end in itself, and have thereby increased their commitment to take this step. We have no evidence that Khrushchev has yetecision to carry through with his threat toreaty. But we believe that it is possible that the Soviets may at any time set on foot the procedures involved in signing the separate treaty.

ncreased Pressures. On the whole, however, we believe it Is somewhat more likely that the Soviets will instead first resort to sharply heightened pressures, in one more effort to extract concessions from the West. In doing this they would defereriod, probably relativelyecision on the treaty and its precise terms. The Soviets are probablythat no important change in the Western position can be obtained without greatly increased pressures, probably ln the form of harassments to impair allied access or unilateral encroachments on Western rights. In the latter category they might, for example, close off East Berlin to Western military traffic, withdraw from the Berlin Air Safety Center, or associate the East Germans more actively with theof access controls. Such steps could beby propaganda intended to create an atmosphere of imminenthis line of action would be Intended


not only to probe Western reaction and convey the Soviets' determination to settle Berlin on their own terms, but also to accomplish gradually some of the final objectiveseace treaty by liquidating certain aspects of four-power

n pursuing this line of increased pressures the primary Soviet aim would still be to extract concessions from the West. Khrushchev would be preparederiod of very high tensions, but would still be careful to maintain contacts with the US. The Soviets might at this stage make at least ostensible adjustments toward moderating their negotiating position. An additional possibility, which the Soviets have already hinted at, would be to involve the UN in this phase, hoping to capitalize on worldwide concern over growing East-West tensions. They might believe, for example,N majority could be woncompromise" which wouldWestern occupation rights with some form of UN role, limited in duration, based on Warsaw Pact and neutral forces as well as Western troops. Moreover, they might expect that if the UN was seized with the crisis, the West could befrom reacting too sharplyeparate treaty.

Soviet leaders probably have some doubts thatpressures will bring about important changesWestern attitude. Moreover, they recognize that atalong this road the risks might becomethey probably believe that certainlimited unilateral steps which would heightencan be controlled. And they probablysuch measures are preferable at this time to theof appearing to acquiesce in further Western stalling,at onceeparate treaty withouttested Western resistance to particular kinds of


any event, we believe that during the next fewSoviets will hold the door open to furtheronly toegree of control over the situation. If

they intensify pressure, they would see continued talks as the means to collect any concessions, or at least to assess the impact of their actions. They would wish, for example, to discover what modalities of control by East Germany would be tolerated by the Western Powers. Even if they proceedeparate treaty, they would hold out the possibility of negotiations should the West decide to change its positionhowdown approached. Or, if the Soviets should decide to allow tensions to subside at some point, they wouldfurther talks as necessary to cover their retreat.

as seemseriod of sharper action isthe Soviets will be reassessing their position andover the next few months. Althoughdepend upon circumstances at the time, if thesuch tacticseriod without significantwould then be more Likely to move ahead andseparate treaty than to accept once again the loss ofInvolvedetreat before Western firmness.

Should the Soviets decide to proceedeparate treaty, this course would still be subject to reappraisal at each stage in the process. They would still seek to gain last minute concessions, and would manipulate the variousforonference,reaty, andit inay as tohange of course if they perceived an important shift in Western attitudes.

In any case, we do not believe that the Soviets are likely to abandon the caution which has characterized theirto situationsirect East-WestThey almost certainly recognize that the balance of military power has undergone no change which would justify this. In undertaking unilateral encroachments or atreaty they would seek to minimize the risks. Thus they might finally decide that an abbreviated treaty, which altered the conditions of access but stopped shortomplete or immediate turnover of controls to the East Germans, wouldufficient advance, at least for the time being.


his estlmote was disseminated by the Central Intelligc copy is for th* Information ond wo of the recipient and jurisdictioneed to know basis. Additional essentlc be authoriied by the following officials within their

of Intelligence and Research, for the

rtment of the Army,or the Deportment of F. for the Department of the Air

Defense Intelligence Agency, for


c Assistani Chief of Staff for Intelli the Department of the Army

Chief of Naval Operatlo

the Navy

Chief of Staff, Intel rig

or the Jointtomic Energy Commission Federol Bureau of Investigation na! Security Agency Reference, CIA for any other Department or


for Intelligence,

of Intelligence.

Director,Director of NSA,Assistant Director


copy ma) applicable security arrangement with t

When an retain itstimate should mission should withlAC

destroyed by burning In accordance with or returned lo the Central Intelligence Agencyf Central Reference, CIA.

disseminated overseas, the overseas recipients may In excess of one year. At the end of this period, the destroyed, returned to tho forwarding agency, or per-iuesled of the forwarding agency lo retain it in accordance

The tfrLe^Hfm estimate when used separately from thoOR^PlCiAL USE ONLY


House inal Security Council lrtmont of Stole lpartmenr of Defense Atomic Energy Commission Federal Bureau of Investigation

Original document.

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic: