NVELOPE
RTTS2YUU SSSRUEALGX.
ZNY SSSSS
HEADER
EP H JCS WASHINGTON DC INFO RUEALGX/SAFE REP OA FM CIA/OSWR
TO RUEHC/DEPT OF STATE//INR AND PASS ACDA/INTELL STAFF RHEGLLL/USDOE IV/KEEP AND PASSTA RHEBAAA/DOEHQ
RUEHDC/DEPT OF COMMERCE//KEEP AND PASS NBS RUEANAT/NASA
RUEKJCS/SECRETARY OF DEFENSE RUEKJCS/DIA RUETIAA/DIRNSA RUEOAYC/USAFSTC
RUCIAEA/FTD WPAFB OH//TOT/NIIS//TOFE RUUJHTA/WHITE SANDS MISSILE RANGE RUEHFB/FBI//INTEL DIV RUWJHRA/MAWTS ONE YUMA
CONTROLS
ftrnttti nnrniiTn*rT mmnri
SECTION 1 OFITE CIA/OSHR
PAGE 2 RUE AIIA2
THIS OMBINED MESSAGE N
BODY
SUBJECT: SCIENCE AND WEAPONS REVIEW 26 AUGUST8
USSRi ATTEMPTING TO IMPEDE WESTERN TACTICAL LASFR WEAPflNC DEVELOPMENT?
THE SOVIET FOREIGN MINISTER RECENTLYPEECH AT THE UN ON THE NEED TO PLACE LIMITS ON NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN CONVENTIONAL HFAPQNS. INCLUDING ANTIPERSONNEL LASER WEAPONS. THE SPEECH IS THE FIRST POSITIVE SOVIET RESPONSE TO A PROPOSED BAN ON THESE MEfiPONS INITIATED IN6 BY SWEDEN. THE NEW
SE
POSITION HAV MORAL GROUND" ON THE PROGRESS ON DEVELOPING
E INTENDED TO ASSUME THE "HIGH ISSUE AND TO IMPEDE US SUCH WEAPON*}.
1. USSR: ATTEMPTING TO IMPEDE WESTERN TACTICAL LASER WEAPONS DEVELOPMENT?
ISARMAMENT AT HIS SPEECH HE REMARKED DEVELOPMENTS IN CONVENTIONAL POINT, SHEVARDNADZE STATED:
RECENTLY, SOVIET FOREIGN MINISTER EDWARD SHEVARDNADZE SPEECH DURING THE THIRD SPECIAL SESSION ON
THE UNITED NATIONS (UN) IN NEW YORK. DURING ON THE NEED TO PLACE LINUS ON NEW WEAPONS. ELABORATING ON THIS
MEMBERS OF THE NON-ALIGNED MOVEMENT ON
OF THE CESSATION
AND PROHIBITION OF THE USE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMENTS FOR DEVELOPING AND EW KINDS AND SYSTEMS OF CONVENTIONAL ARMS. WE REGARD AS EXTREMELY
PAGE UEAIIA2 .
INTERESTING THE IDEA OFYSTEMATIC ASSESSMENT OF SCIENTIFIC ANO TECHNOLOGICAL ACHIEVEMENTS IMELY ELABORATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS ON PREVENTING THE USE OF NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR .WEAPONTHIS SHOULD BE DONE IN THE FIRST PLACE WITH RESPECT TO LASER, GENETIC, AND ELECTROMAGNETIC SYSTEMS. NE NOTE THE IMPORTANCE OF THE PROPOSAL OF SWEDEN TO BAN THE USE OF BATTLEFIELD LASFR HEnPDNS FOR BLINDTNS PERSONNEL. wgjg
THE SWEDES REPEATEDLY HAVE ATTEMPTED TO HAVEESOLUTION CALLING FOR A BAN AGAINST ANTIPERSONNELA PONS--BASED ON HiWAJLLIMLAW GROUNDS APPROVED BY THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY. THEY FIRST FORMALLY PROPOSED SUCH A RESOLUTION DURING THEH INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS CONFERENCE IN GENEVA IN OCTOBER 6 AS PART OF THE LAW ON LAND WARFARE. (THIS RESOLUTION HAS REJECTED BY THE CONFEREESESULT OF USSRN)SITION FROM SEVERAL COUNTRIES. INCLUDING THE
ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS THROUGHOUT THE SWEDES SOUGHT
PAGE 6 2 SUPPORT FOR THIS RESOLUTION. FOR EXAMPLE i
IN APRIL THE SWEDISH MISSION IN GENEVA HOSTED AN INFORMAL MULTINATIONAL MEETING TO REVIEW THEIR PROPOSAL. (THE SOVIETS WERE NOTICEABLY ABSENT AT THIS MEETING AND THE SWEDES WERE OPENLY DISAPPOINTED BY THEIR ABSENCE.)
IN AMBASSADOR BRITT THEORIN, THE CHAIRMAN OF THE SWEDISH DELEGATION TO THE UN DISARMAMENT COMMISSION, STATED THAT SWEDEN CONSIDERED THE USE OF ANTIPERSONNEL LEAR CONTRAVENTION OF FUNDAMENTAL HUMANITARIAN PRINCIPLES IN THE LAW OF LAND WARFARE."
IN SWEDEN CIRCULATED A "REQUEST FOR VIEWS" OF THE RESOLUTION THEY WOULD PROPOSE TO THE 2ND UN GENERAL ASSEMBLY IN NOVEMBER
COMMENTi
SHEVARDNADZE'S SPEECH IS THE FIRST POSITIVE RESPONSE BY THE
beginning ofpage 2 3 U' t
soviets about the swedish initiative to banJ-ffSifJ^. up untilecent un statement, the soviets and their warsaw pact clients have been silent or were negative on this issue. although shevardnadze'sn oneouivocal endorsement of the swedish proposal, we believe that the statement enior soviet diplomat will encourage the swedes to continue to seek and develop international support for this proposal. this
ImportantHE Soviets for tho
first, until .the statement by shevardnadze, no major power had endorsed the swedish proposal. in fact, in previous
h the united states and the ussr have been unreceptive to the proposal. with the soviets
the proposal of sweden to
ban the use of battlefield laser they may be
attempting to assume the "high moral ground" in the eyes international community.
page3 -6 EC Kf
westernhe ussr
tvdeveloping laser technology makes
Xg_wea^nNSiets' by publicly acknowledging the ?nMpfTJ*Tt ?l se shedish proposal, may be attempting to
'C J AL env"onment forEvelopment programs that they thf hPABe engineering development
4DE US RESEARCHweapons development tn tuc iiccd hschaccessibie to the public scrutiny than in the ussr. the soviets may hope their recent
swedish proposal rfnlpDoeur0pean huitarv laser research rSCRUTINY and debate, with the hope ofif not outright
cancellation. this tactic would be especially advantageous to the soviets because their
SpENLDEbI?EtDT SUBJECT
OPEf^ebateand, thus, could proceed unhindered..
13 c rt
sec
Original document.
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: