MEMORANDUM FOR:. King, Chief,on
uses Sec State's permiosive remark* reegree that leftist prras could quote Congress aaelieve that the. nor Ruaaia" theme worksSoviets aa it tends to support one of the major Sovietisolation of.
far distant and ol little intereat to Latinktatea rather than making the point that internationalsays it istiny minority" in Latin American countries) Latin America. This argument as presented couldthe aboye paragraph treatment tenderiod of time to polarize
in the minds of Latin Americans the struggle as being between. and RuoBia. and therefromeutralist attitude in Latin America.
1. It docs not seem sufficiently to define Soviet intervention as not being limited to intervention ae Latin Americas have come to define it.
It states, in effect, that Communism's errow/"the confusion of the means with the ends". In this respect it ia not anti-Marxist but only anti -Stalinist. Stalinism is becoming meana that the USSR recently items to bc abandoning.
Otherwise the approach is allright.
a. Nutting's covering letter states it is not to be considered hia recommendation for the final product but is left to Rolender's judgment. If it ia to become Rolender's responsibility,nfer to be the caae, it should have had prior Headquarters approval. ad thought that Nutting understood that all policy PW positions such as this require Headquarters approval. His failure in thishattation not under PF1SUCCESS jurisdiction, ia not understandable.
CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGRAM RELEASEAS SANITIZED
ROUTING AND RECORD SHEET j-
MIIMKIIOIU: n"TO" column. Unde* fich iWd ba df.wn sumi
and Mck (mkmM nwnbefed locwmvmi4Ik* numbaf In Ik* "TO" coljran. Eachthtorfd Muuai (tkMk nwfc inurffccwnt)
lurthcr ro*tir>f TlwiShaMbaajItUy.Original document.