: UL 5lt
historical review program release as sanitized
ROUT IKE
f^E:
CITES C
POLIT SECTION OF EU& HASFC-RUED OY FONOFF THAT BRITISH DO NOT niSH TO PARTICIPATEROPOSAr. CONTAIHEO 'HREF, HO ft EVER THEY HAVE NOTANT OBJECTION TO AtfCF^CAPCi CftRRVMNO OUT PLAN, FONCFF ATTITUDE UNDERSTANDABLE IN VIEW OF DEllOACY OF SITUATION* -auCrt COWCNT IN PRESS AVOEC- II PARLIAMENT / ^ . IMPLICATION IN BUATENALANS ITSa i POM CRITICISM Af:f>HE IP. EFFORTS IN TH!
2- SITUftT-Ck ALSO DELICATE WITH WARD
SC ACTIVITIES SUCH AS SUGGESTED iH
BECAUSErCf UMCEHTAIHTY JF BI5 PERSONAL POSITION ANDOF
J. AS HATTER STANDS IT IS PlAO'^TjrXT^MR. ZlVMERVAHjSECTION, EMB WILL CAREFULLYCS[fofSSU re 3
ITOPY OF fMB MESSAGE Cow
)
PAGE 2
AND THEN ON BASiS OF OLD FRIENDSHIP SUGGEST TO HIM THAT IN RESPONSE TO HIS OFFER OF COOPERATION MADE TO AMBASSADOR WE CONSIDER IT DESIRABLE THAT AT APPROPRIATE TIME FROM HIS POINT OF VIEW HE MAKE STATEMENT TO PRESS ALONG LINES INDICATED IN REF0 OR AS CLOSE TO SUGGESTED LINE AS HE CONSIDERS ADVISABLE,
SEC W T
END OF MESSAGE
Original document.
Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: