INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT OF THE LIEUTENANT COMMANDER SPEICHER CASE

Created: 3/27/2001

OCR scan of the original document, errors are possible

1

Intelligence CorarrjLinity Assessment of the Lieutenant Commander

Speicher Case

Scope Note: This is an unclassified susnary of the "Intelligence Coiporanlty Assessment of the Lieutenant Commander Speicher Case-produced at the request of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. The requirement to protect classified sources and methods prevented the inclusion of classified material that pertains to the case. The unclassified version is therefore incomplete, and the overall judgments of the assessment may not be fully supported by the unclassified content provided.

Introduction

8 Hornet, piloted by LCDR Michael Scott Speicher, was brought down over west-central Iraqission onanuaryonly aircraft downed that first night of the afr war. LCDR Speicher was the only US serviceman lost over land during Operation Desert Storm whose status remained Killed in Action-Body Not Recovered The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence has asked the Intelligence Community (IC) to assess the Speicher case and also to provide an unclassified version of the assessment.

We assess that Iraq can account for LCDR Speicher but that Baghdad is concealing information about his fate. LCDR Speicher probably survived the loss of his aircraft, and if he survived, he almost certainly was captured by the Iraqis.

Might of the Shootdown

During Desert Storm, none of the limited information available on coalition personnel lost was linked to the fate of LCDR Speicher. No information during the Gulf war conclusively revealed how LCDR Speicher's aircraft was destroyed. Postwar analysis suggests that LCDR Speicher's Hornet was downed by an Iraqi Air Force aircraft firing an air-to-air missile. LCDR Speicher's aircraft crashed in the desert west of Baghdad.

1 OnCDR Speicher's status was changed to Missing inFOR RELEASE

DATE: MAY

During the shootdown of LCDR Speicher's aircraft, no

parachute waswasneither combat search-and-rescue resources nor intelligence revealed any indication that LCDR Speicher tried to signal by radio, beacon, or other means, we judge that this information is inconclusive with regard to the fate of LCDR Speicher; the lack of observed parachutes and radio calls or other signals are not definitive indicatorsilot's fate.

Iraqi Repatriations..Jio Accounting for LCDR Speicher

Shortly after the Desert Storm cease-fire, Iraq began repatriating captured Coalition personnel. With the exception of LCDR Speicheraudi Arabianll other Coalition airmen downed over land during the war with Iraq were accounted for. Baghdad either released the airmen or returned remains that were later positively identified.2

We judge that the regime was aware of Western press reports during the war that indicated LCDR Speicher was dead. Therefore, Baghdad probably did not feel compelled to accurately account for LCDR Speicher. The absence of contacts between LCOR Speicher and US forces after his ejection or with other Coalition prisoners of war (POWs) is an inconclusive indicator of LCDR Speicher's fate.

False Remains

In, Iraqmall amount of human remains and identified the remainsilot namedaboratory results revealed the remains were human, but not those of LCDR Speicher. Saddam's regime probably hoped the unidentified remains would satisfy Washington. Baghdad has since claimed that LCDR Speicher was devoured by animals and that no remains were found.

Crash Site Survey and Excavation

In8 crash site in southwestern Iraq was located and US authorities were notified. The wreckage was confirmed to be that of LCDR Speicher's aircraft. The site was located on imagery insingmagery taken On the ICRC, at the request of the USG, contacted Iraq about the US plan to excavate8

1 Baghdad releasedS ouUitaryo the custody of the International Coasaiccc* ofRed Croaa (ICRC)adcuun was quick to order the release of Coalition POWs and return resfurther military attacks by Coalition forces.

2

crash sice in Iraq. Baghdad delayed Che matter until lace5 when Iraqi permission for the team's entry was obtained.

The team was in Iraq6 December. The investigators passed the approximate location of the crash sice Co their Iraqi contacts on Che nightecember. The ICRC team traveled to the location Che next morning. The ICRC team found evidence thac the site had been experCly searched within one month prior to the team's arrival: the Iraqis excavated the cockpit area of the wreckage and removed all significant cockpit debris. S8 aircraft mishap investigator who participated in5 ICRC excavation also believed the wreckage was likely examined in the month preceding the survey but thac major portions of the cockpiC and insCrument bay section were removed years prior to the ICRC team's arrival.

Analysis of the wreckage by US Navy experts concluded that LCDR Speicher initiated the ejection sequence, jettisoned the canopy, and likely ejected from the stricken aircraft prior to the crash. The canopy was located near the crash sice; Che ejection seat could not be found. Investigators were able to examine other parts of the aircraft including large portions of the wings and the fuselage behind the cockpit, the cockpiC canopy frame, Che engines, and wing pylons. In addition, the teamata storage unit and fragments of life support equipment, as welllight suit handed over by the Iraqis, (see below)

US Navy analysis of8 wreckage resulting from5 crash-site excavation showed the forward part of LCDR Speicher's aircraftatascrophic event in the early mo.rn.infl hours oft the time of the first impact LCDR8 was0 feet and traveling0 kts). The Hornetower loss, prior to the canopy being jettisoned. Evidence indicates the impact chrew the aircraft laterally off its flight path at leastoegrees, subjecting the aircraftoad.

1eport from Naval Air Warfare Center (NAWC) Weapons Division. China Lake, to Casualty identification Laboratory Hawaii (CILHI) and DPMO dated entitled "Investigation of Aviation Life Support System Equipment Recovered8rash Site in the Wester Region ofmok* from COMNAVSATECEN to CILHI and DPMO datedntitled 'DPHO/CXLHI Aircraft Mishap* Memo from Joint ICRC-Iraql recovery team anthropologist to ComMnder. CILHI, datedntitled "Search and Recovery8 Aircraft Crash Site in the vicinity of Tulul ad al-Dulaym. Wadl Thumayl. Republic of Iraq.S."

3

US Navy investigators concluded that the pilot was not incapacitated by the initial incident. Flight surgeons and aircraft life support systems experts believe LCDR Speicher would have had at leastoercent chance of surviving (with second-degree burns to exposed skin) the resultant flash heat and fire and aerodynamic forces of the initial impact that brought down his aircraft. According to several Gulf.war veterans and US military aircrew, LCDR Speicher was probably well protected from the flash fire by his flight gear.

During the5 survey, the Iraqis directed ICRC team members to the flight suit which was purportedly "found"edouin boy, but the official Casualty Identification Laboratory Hawaii (CILHI) examination of the suit concluded it showed minimal weathering and adherent soil. We believe the Iraqis planted the flight suit. Near the site where the Iraqis claimed the uniform wasew samples of other pilot-related materials were found. Some or all of these items may not have originated in the area in which they were recovered, according to the investigation's results.1

US Navy experts assessed that the flight suit was the right type and the same size as the suit worn by LCDR Speicher. They also determined that the location and shape of the velcro used to affix patches was correct for LCDR Speicher and his unit. The condition of the returned flight suit also indicates that the aviator was not in the aircraft at ground impact. Specialists determined that damage to the recovered flight suit indicates exposureew seconds of heat. Also, the flight suit showedrace of possible blood. We can only speculate as to why the Iraqis chose to return the flight suit. They may have calculated that they had to produce "some evidence related to the pilot in order to appear cooperative and put an end to further inquiries. They could have altered the evidence to mislead investigators.

According to US Navy data,8 ejection statistics reveal thatercent of pilots survive. This same data shows that of the pilots who ejected over land and survived,ercent were injured in some way. Navy experts assessed that LCDR Speicher probably was injured during the

* Six fragments of anarment of the type used by LCDR Speicher were recovered, as were portions of an ejection seat upper leg;ignal flare, Eragisentsife reftortionarachute protective cover (all consistent with the eoulpaaent types issued8 pilots). None of these items were apparently exposed to heat.

4

ejection and parachute landing. These injuries could have resulted from parachute opening shock and from his parachute landing. eview of postwar reporting from downed aircrew indicates some were seriously injured by their ejection and parachute landing, while others suffered relatively minor injuries or survived unscathed.5

s>

The Iraqis could have cut-off the suit because they did not know how to properly release the various fasteners or were perhaps trying to intimidate their captive. The cuts also could indicate the pilot was injured, unconscious or deceased when the uniform was removed. Alternatively, the Iraqi regime may have altered the flight suit (for example, by cutting) to deceive foreign investigators.

We do not know if LCDR Speicher survived the ejection sequence or subsequent landing, but the lack of crash-site evidence of LCDR speicher's death, US Navy statistical data associated8nd the condition of the returned flight suit suggest that he probably survived the crash of

Conclusion

The way Baghdad has handled the case-falsely suggesting that remains returned1 were those of LCDR Speicher, tampering with8 wreckage before5 crash site excavation, planting the flight suit for crash investigators to find, and declining to account accurately for LCDR Speicher-raises troubling questions about his fate

The regime madeigh priority to capture enemy personnel or recover remains inside Iraqi-controlled territory, and Baghdad would have thoroughly investigated the' matter until the pilot was captured or the remains recovered. Baghdad's efforts to recover Coalition airmen downed over Iraqi-controlled territory were highly successful.

We judge that Baghdad was aware of1 western press reportsS aircraft was shot down over Iraq on the first night of the war and that the pilot was believed to be the first US casualty of Desert Storm. The press reports would have

1 Additional Injuries were often inflicted by Iraqi soldiers immediately after capture. Raturnees report being shoved to the ground, kicked, and beaten with rifle butts or other Implement*. Prisoners were also subjected to beatings and torture during formal intarrogations at various headquarters and detention facilities throughout Iraq.

5

caused Iraqi intelligence to investigate, and the information very likely helped Baghdad focus its search for the wreckage and the pilot.

We assess LCDR Speicher was either captured alive or his remains were recovered and brought to Baghdad.

6

Original document.

Comment about this article, ask questions, or add new information about this topic: