Mercury Mercury 1975

Model Mercury made in 1975 by Mercury got 2 recalls. There were some recalls concerningpower train, seat belts.

Model 1975

Recalls


CampaignManufacturerManufacturing dateType# of units affectedDate Owner notified MfgRecall Initiated byManufacturers of recalled vehicles/productsReport Recieved DateRecord Creation DateRegulation Part NumberFMVSS Number
POWER TRAIN - AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION - GEAR POSITION INDICATION (PRNDL)
81V008000FORD MOTOR COMPANYfrom 09/01/1969 to 08/01/1980V (Vehicle)21000000ODIFORD MOTOR COMPANY01/12/198102/12/1981
Defect SummaryThis is a manufacturers notice to advise owners of proper vehicle operation. the parking gear may not be securely engaged after the operator has attempted to shift to park. the vehicle may appear to be in park though actually in reverse. this could allow the vehicle to move unexpectedly.
Consequence Summary
Corrective SummaryOwners will be provided with a self-sticking label containing important safety precautions as a daily reminder of the serious hazards of unexpected vehicle motion. it should be placed inside the vehicle in an easily seen location.
NotesVehicle description: passenger vehicles and light trucks equipped with fmx,c-3, c-4, c-6, or jatco automatic transmissions.system: power train; automatic transmission.consequences of defect: unexpected vehicle movement may result in accident,injury or death, especially to persons in the path of the vehicle.note: drivers should observe these steps: 1) make certain gear lever is engagedin park, 2) set parking brake fully, and 3) shut off ignition.
SEAT BELTS - REAR
74V135000FORD MOTOR COMPANY V (Vehicle)76208/28/1974MFRFORD MOTOR COMPANY08/26/197410/12/1979
Defect Summary
Consequence Summary
Corrective Summary
NotesMercury campaign no 130.equipped with deluxe seat belts.possibility that1974 model rear seat belts assemblies were inadvertently installed in 1975model vehicles.also possibility exists that a mix of 1974 and 1975 modelcenter and outboard rear seat belts may have been installed in the samevehicle.if this condition exists the assemblies are not compatibile andoccupants would be unrestrained.