A clash of methodology and ethics in "undercover" social science

Article Abstract:

The criticism on methodological and ethical grounds, the undercover or 'covert' approach to fieldwork continues to be a useful technique in certain settings, however, questions remain about the credibility of the published findings from such work. It is found that an attempt by researchers to prove their study as beneficial to greater peer investigation can place subjects at risk of unwanted notoriety or even danger.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code:

Interpretive social science and the "native's point of view": a close look

Article Abstract:

The interpretive approach to anthropological research has gained increased popularity since the 1970s. The interpretive approach advocates the study of human beings based on humanities rather than social science concepts. It is argued that the interpretive approach gained support due to a loss of faith in conventional social scientific approaches which involve emulating the methods and techniques of natural sciences.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code:

Research ethics and the interpretive stance in fieldwork

Article Abstract:

T. Jones has charged "interpretive social science" with violation of ethical principles, but the issue is complex. Topics discussed include the interpretivist as trickster, rhetorical responsibility, and the morality of arbitrariness.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code: