Jail videotapes, not meant to be retained, not public records

Article Abstract:

The Missouri Supreme Court ruled in Hemeyer v. KRCG-TV that videotapes made during the booking of a state representative into a county jail were not "public records" subject to public disclosure under the state opens records law. The law plainly requires that a record must be retained in order to be a public record, the court noted. In this instance, videotapes used to monitor the jail were taped over every four days.

Laws, regulations and rules, Electronic monitoring of prisoners, Electronic prisoner monitoring

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

911 audiotapes are not public records: court finds tape exempt as 'noncriminal incident report'

Article Abstract:

The Virginia Supreme Court ruled in Tull v. Brown that recordings of a 911 call regarding a child who had stopped breathing need not be disclosed to the media under the Freedom of Information Act. The Court ruled it was an exempt noncriminal incident report. The news media argued that the sheriff's office did not create or fund the system that recorded the tape and acted merely as the tape's custodian.

Virginia, Media coverage, Emergency reporting systems (Telephone)

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA

Police videotapes of bookings are public records

Article Abstract:

The Missouri Supreme Court ruled Hemeyer v. KRCG-TV that police videotapes of criminal suspects' bookings were public records and ordered the county seeking their closure to pay legal costs for withholding them.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


subjects list: Public records, Missouri, Access control, Police, Police officers, Records and correspondence
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.