Regulatory reform and judicial review

Article Abstract:

The judicial review provisions of Senate bill 343 would not increased the litigation burdens imposed on administrative agencies, contrary to the claims of opponents of regulatory reform. The standard of review is unchanged, and procedural compliance can only be challenged if noncompliance led to a materially different result. The cost-benefit requirements of the bill may actually reduce litigation by improving agency decision-making. Congressional oversight, as an alternative to judicial review, would not have provided adequate remedies.

Author: Dean, Warren L., Jr.
Interpretation and construction, Administrative law

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA


To preserve meaningful judicial review

Article Abstract:

Judicial review must continue as an important element in the conduct of administrative agencies. The injury-in-fact standard and the presumption of judicial review are vital to maintaining this judicial function. The rule of law must always control agency conduct, not political motivations.

Author: Funk, William F.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

CAPTCHA



Subjects list: United States, Analysis, Judicial review of administrative acts
This website is not affiliated with document authors or copyright owners. This page is provided for informational purposes only. Unintentional errors are possible.