Article Abstract:
The district courts in two federal cases ruled in favor of the employer regarding post-employment health insurance benefits under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA). In Allen v. Loyola University, the court ruled that no continuing contractual agreement existed between a former employee and the employer's insurer. In Disabatino v. Disabatino Brothers, Inc., the court levied a fine against the employer for failing to give notice that COBRA coverage would be terminated but did not find that coverage had to continue.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
The facts giving rise to Meadows v Cagle's Inc were that the spouse of an incompetent former employee declined to exercise her COBRA rights in a timely fashion and that the insurance company declined coverage. The judges held that giving the plaintiff just a COBRA notice was insufficient, and that only if he had been given the plan documents could he have made an informed decision on the employee's behalf.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
The US District Court of Southern New York in 1997's Carner v. MGS and its sister case held that the terminated plaintiff was not given adequate notice under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA). The court found that the defendants, which it treated as a single employer, breached their fiduciary duties by not following COBRA rules. Testimonial evidence supported the plaintiff.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic: