Article Abstract:
The problem of bureaucratic accountability has received considerable attention in the literature of public administration, but few studies have considered the extent to which extra-governmental agencies are held accountable to governments or legislatures. This paper examines administrative devolution and the problem of accountability, using the non-profit housing program as an example. It argues that devolution of programs, without adjusting for the resulting loss of bureaucratic control, leaves governments with little information about, or control over, the people who make decisions about large expenditures of public funds. It concludes that if the advantages of using the voluntary sector for social service delivery are to outweigh the problems of reduced accountability, forms of control - such as incentives for compliance and internal professional standards - which do not limit the autonomy of these groups, but which can enhance pre-audit accountability, need to be developed. (Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
There has been increased attention on permanent public servants who have had greater impact on the policy process in government than is desirable. Attention is focused on staff help to ministers in the area which would increase ministerial capacity in policy direction of the department as well as policy servants. Possible resources for ministers are analyzed, as are the responsibilities and backgrounds of many ministerial businesses. Problematic areas of current arrangements are identified, and reforms are suggested which do not require great structural change to implement in the current public administration system. Ministers now have a yearly exemption for staff of over two hundred thousand dollars.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
The effectiveness of Canadian governmental agencies and the government as a whole could be improved if the administrative groups within the organization did not wield quite so much power. Administrators with too much power result in government services that are geared to the needs of the administrators, rather than the service producers or the public. Proposed organizational changes for the Canadian government are discussed, including decentralization, emphasis on regional issues and problems, and the establishment of public advisory groups. Also discussed are the barriers to such organizational changes, and how these barriers may be overcome.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic: