Article Abstract:
Nintendo of America Inc has been cleared of charges made by Atari Corp that the Japanese video game giant had knowingly and illegally worked to monopolize the US home video game market in the late 1980s. The decision in the antitrust suit was handed down in a San Francisco, CA court in May 1992, and dealt a severe blow to Atari, an American video game giant. While the jury acknowledged that Nintendo had attained monopoly status, it determined that the Japanese firm had not actually attempted to do so. The jury was unable to reach a decision on whether Nintendo had abused its monopoly position once it was achieved. However, it did find that Atari's financial difficulties were not caused by Nintendo. Atari may ask for a retrial on the unresolved counts, despite the general feeling in the industry that Atari's case against Nintendo is over. The judgment may be a landmark for Nintendo, which faces antitrust claims in numerous other lawsuits.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
Apple's vice chairman and a former executive are held liable for almost $100 million in damages in a securities-fraud suit launched by Apple shareholders in 1984. The initial law suit accused Apple and several officers of making materially misleading statements in a 1982 press release about a disk drive under development at the time. Apple introduced the drive, known as Twiggy, in spring of 1983, but discontinued it by Sep 1983 causing company stock to drop 25 percent. A federal court in California exonerated Apple itself, but held liable for securities fraud A.C. Markkula, company cofounder and vice chairman, and John Vennard, who headed the company's peripheral division during the period in question. The jury findings hold Apple responsible for some $2.90 of the $8-a-share drop in company stock the day after it discontinued Twiggy. Apple claims the verdict was wrong and intends to appeal.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:
Article Abstract:
Atari Corp brings Japanese Nintendo Co Ltd to US federal court in San Francisco for allegedly unfair competitive practices. The suit accuses Nintendo of monopolizing 80 percent of the video game market by illegally prohibiting its licensees from making Nintendo games compatible with competitors' systems. The suit claims that the prohibition, which was lifted in Dec 1990, inflated retail prices for such games and equipment to exorbitant degrees. Atari claims that it lost $160 million between 1986 and 1990 as a result of Nintendo's actions. Atari will gain treble damages if the firm wins the case. Meanwhile, Nintendo blames Atari's losses on the US firm's own poor business strategies.
User Contributions:
Comment about this article or add new information about this topic: