Insistent questions: a simple test could resolve the matter

Article Abstract:

The debate surrounding the origins of Heinrich Schliemann's gold masks can be determined through a simple microscopic examination. While experts have argued over stylistic and composition issues or Schliemann's reputation for making false claims, a microscopic examination of alloyed mineral corrosion would enable archeologists to learn whether the masks had indeed been buried for centuries. To date, however, Greek authorities have denied permission for this type of examination.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code:

Is the mask a hoax?

Article Abstract:

The gold masks discovered by archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann may be forgeries for several reasons. The masks differ stylistically from all other recovered Mycenaean masks, and were an extraordinary find for a single locale. Schliemann's poor reputation also casts doubt on the veracity of the artifacts, as he had previously been accused of, and had admitted to, planting objects he later claimed to have found.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code:

Not a forgery; how about a pastiche?

Article Abstract:

The gold masks discovered by Heinrich Schliemann may indeed be authentic, but reworked in contemporary times to fit a presupposed stylistic image. It is possible that Schliemann believed the masks to have been flattened or damaged during their centuries under the grave site, and set about "restoring" them to their proper compositions.

User Contributions:

Comment about this article or add new information about this topic:

Comment:  (50-4000 characters)

Name:

E-mail:

Security Code: